|
|
|
Minnesota Statute 169A.51
Chemical Tests for Intoxication
|
Source:
Minnesota Office of the Revisor of Statutes
Subdivision 1.
Implied consent; conditions; election of
test. (a) Any person who drives,
operates, or is in physical control of a
motor vehicle within this state or on any
boundary water of this state consents,
subject to the provisions of sections
169A.50
to
169A.53
(implied consent law), and section
169A.20
(driving while impaired), to a chemical test
of that person's blood, breath, or urine for
the purpose of determining the presence of
alcohol, a controlled substance or its
metabolite, or a hazardous substance. The
test must be administered at the direction
of a peace officer.
(b) The test may be required of a person
when an officer has probable cause to
believe the
person was driving, operating, or in
physical control of a motor vehicle in
violation of section
169A.20
(driving while impaired), and one of the
following conditions exist:
(1) the person has been lawfully placed
under arrest for violation of section
169A.20
or
an ordinance in conformity with it;
(2) the person has been involved in a motor
vehicle accident or collision resulting in
property
damage, personal injury, or death;
(3) the person has refused to take the
screening test provided for by section
169A.41
(preliminary screening test); or
(4) the screening test was administered and
indicated an alcohol concentration of 0.08
or
more.
(c) The test may also be required of a
person when an officer has probable cause to
believe
the person was driving, operating, or in
physical control of a commercial motor
vehicle with
the presence of any alcohol.
Subd. 2. Implied
consent advisory. At the time a test is
requested, the person must be
informed:
(1) that Minnesota law requires the person
to take a test:
(i) to determine if the person is under the
influence of alcohol, controlled substances,
or
hazardous substances;
(ii) to determine the presence of a
controlled substance listed in schedule I or
II or metabolite,
other than marijuana or
tetrahydrocannabinols; and
(iii) if the motor vehicle was a commercial
motor vehicle, to determine the presence of
alcohol;
(2) that refusal to take a test is a crime;
(3) if the peace officer has probable cause
to believe the person has violated the
criminal
vehicular homicide and injury laws, that a
test will be taken with or without the
person's consent; and
(4) that the person has the right to consult
with an attorney, but that this right is
limited to the
extent that it cannot unreasonably delay
administration of the test.
Subd.
3. Type of test. The peace
officer who requires a test pursuant to this
section may
direct whether the test is of blood, breath,
or urine. Action may be taken against a
person who
refuses to take a blood test only if an
alternative test was offered and action may
be taken against a person who refuses to
take a urine test only if an alternative
test was offered.
Subd. 4.
Requirement of urine or blood test.
Notwithstanding subdivision 3, a blood or
urine test may be required even after a
breath test has been administered if there
is probable
cause to believe that:
(1) there is impairment by a controlled
substance or a hazardous substance that is
not subject
to testing by a breath test; or
(2) a controlled substance listed in
schedule I or II or its metabolite, other
than marijuana or
tetrahydrocannabinols, is present in the
person's body.
Action may be taken against a person who
refuses to take a blood test under this
subdivision
only if a urine test was offered and action
may be taken against a person who refuses to
take
a urine test only if a blood test was
offered.
Subd. 5. Breath
test using approved breath-testing
instrument. (a) In the case of a breath
test administered using an infrared or other
approved breath-testing instrument, the test
must consist of analyses in the following
sequence: one adequate breath-sample
analysis, one control analysis, and a
second, adequate breath-sample analysis.
(b) In the case of a test administered using
an infrared or other approved breath-testing
instrument, a sample is adequate if the
instrument analyzes the sample and does not
indicate the
sample is deficient.
(c) For purposes of section
169A.52
(revocation of license for test failure or
refusal), when a
test is administered using an infrared or
other approved breath-testing instrument,
failure of a
person to provide two separate, adequate
breath samples in the proper sequence
constitutes
a refusal.
(d) For purposes of section
169A.52
(revocation of license for test failure or
refusal), when
a test is administered using an infrared or
other approved breath-testing instrument, a
breath
test consisting of two separate, adequate
breath samples within 0.02 alcohol
concentration is
acceptable. A breath test consisting of two
separate, adequate breath samples failing to
meet this criterion is deficient.
(e) If the first breath test is deficient,
as defined by paragraph (d), a second breath
test must
be administered.
(f) Two deficient breath tests, as defined
by paragraph (d), constitute a refusal.
Subd. 6. Consent
of person incapable of refusal not
withdrawn. A person who is
unconscious or who is otherwise in a
condition rendering the person incapable of
refusal is
deemed not to have withdrawn the consent
provided by subdivision 1 and the test may
be given.
Subd. 7.
Requirements for conducting tests;
liability. (a) Only a physician, medical
technician, emergency medical
technician-paramedic, registered nurse,
medical technologist,
medical laboratory technician, phlebotomist,
or laboratory assistant acting at the
request of a
peace officer may withdraw blood for the
purpose of determining the presence of
alcohol, a
controlled substance or its metabolite, or a
hazardous substance. This limitation does
not apply to the taking of a breath or urine
sample.
(b) The person tested has the right to
have someone of the person's own choosing
administer
a chemical test or tests in addition to any
administered at the direction of a peace
officer; provided, that the additional test
sample on behalf of the person is obtained
at the place where the person is in custody,
after the test administered at the direction
of a peace officer, and at no expense to the
state. The failure or inability to obtain an
additional test or tests by a person does
not preclude the admission in evidence of
the test taken at the direction of a peace
officer unless the additional test was
prevented or denied by the peace officer.
(c) The physician, medical technician,
emergency medical technician-paramedic,
medical
technologist, medical laboratory technician,
laboratory assistant, phlebotomist, or
registered nurse drawing blood at the
request of a peace officer for the purpose
of determining the concentration of alcohol,
a controlled substance or its metabolite, or
a hazardous substance is in no manner liable
in any civil or criminal action except for
negligence in drawing the blood. The person
administering a breath test must be fully
trained in the administration of breath
tests pursuant to training given by the
commissioner of public safety.
|